Peer Review Process

FUTUREd follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, quality, and academic integrity.

Review Steps

1. Submission

Authors submit manuscripts in accordance with journal guidelines.

2. Initial Screening

The editorial team reviews submissions for relevance, quality, and adherence to formatting requirements.

3. Double-Blind Review

Each manuscript is redacted (to conceal author information) and submitted to at least two reviewers.

Reviewers are selected from institutions different from the submitting author(s) to ensure independence.

4. Evaluation Criteria
  • Originality and contribution to the field
  • Methodological rigor or theoretical coherence
  • Clarity and organization
  • Relevance to the journal’s scope
5. Decision Outcomes
  • Accept
  • Minor revisions
  • Major revisions
  • Reject
6. Revision and Final Decision

Authors revise their work based on feedback. Final decisions are made by the editorial team.